Sunday, March 25, 2012

Coping with Infinity, Ignoring the Housework


After two months reading every miserable word of the school’s pristine copy of Moby Dick, I decided that wornness should be my selection criteria for reading material.  I turned, then the most ragged book on my parents' shelf, The Road Less Traveled.  At the time, I had no faculty for understanding or implementing any of it.  In my defense, I was eleven.*

Somehow, the lesson I took from the Peck’s book was that each minute decision—each literal step that you took— had to be infused with purpose and intention and all sorts of seize-the-day nonsense.  The consequence of failure do so would be a lifetime of misery and wasted potential. 

The mental effort to walk the quarter-mile home from school became exhausting.  

Purpose AND misery: Moby Dick has it all!  Image by Tom Neely, http://www.iwilldestroyyounews.blogspot.com/ 
One day, I found myself unable to muster sufficient joie de vivre to justify another step in the 110 degree heat while laden with a book-stuffed backpack.  But I also wasn’t ready to concede that I failed life by fifth grade.  So I took off my backpack and sat down on the curb.  I thought that if I sat long enough on the baking sidewalk, I would get hot enough and miserable enough that the physical act of walking would become appealing.  Only then would I proceed.    

A few minutes later, I regretted not having my realization in the shade.  And about twenty minutes after that, I gave up and trudged home. 

Five minutes later, at home, I resigned myself to an unhappy life.  It would be worth it, so long as there were popsicles and air conditioning.    

No misery can withstand the awesomeness of Dreyer's Coconut Fruit Bars.
I always expect routine to save me from mental drudgery.  It never does.  But wouldn’t it be wonderful to become an automaton for unpleasant tasks, leaving your brain free to roam places amusing or exciting or creative?  It seems such a thing could be possible, if you worked hard enough at the outset to establish the habit. 

That’s why I drafted a policies and procedures manual for keeping my house clean.  And why the house is always a mess.  

But I’m still not ready to admit the necessity of mental drudgery, not when there are such interesting-looking books about habit formation I've yet to read and implement.  

I wish I were kidding.  But probably not as much as my family wishes. 
But so far, I can't get housework routinized to the degree I'd like.  Each item out of its place represents a flaw in the organizational masterplan, and the housework-avoidant brain tries to rewrite the code to accommodate all exceptions.  An aquarium needs only infrequent maintenance with the right balance of fish and plants.  I dream that one day my own habitat will achieve homeostasis.  
And by "plants" I mean copious amounts of green and brown algae.
 In the meantime, housework (when I do it) requires lots of mental bandwidth, choking capacity that could otherwise be used for processing things that happened or things I’ve read.  Creative projects, or family, or work.  For contemplating the vast beauty of creation or shipping Dair on Gossip Girl.  By which I mean to say, it’s mood-dependent.  

In the meantime, I’m in the mood to think about housework when there’s a narrative to it—a hint of the epic, a foe to be overcome.  I fall in and out of love with housework about twice a year. 

The problem, of course, is that housework is always just a little bit hot for me.  

I can't tell which is more strange: that this is sometimes true, or sometimes isn't.
There is a brain disorder called apraxia, in which a person is unable to complete tasks on command, despite understanding the command, wanting to perform, and having the physical ability and prerequisite knowledge to do it.  It can be caused by stroke, tumor, or traumatic brain injury.   Or you can be born with it, to varying degrees. 

When children learn to speak, a word when first spoken will fix in their brain.  A baby will mispronounce something once and again, often bestowing a baby-made nickname on people and objects.  “Apple” is always “apo” until they’re old enough to consciously create a new habit, at which point the correct pronunciation replaces the misspoken name.  Apraxic children grope with their mouths for words, for sounds, for the various components of word formation which, when you think about it, is incredibly complex—holding ones lips, tongue, and throat in the right position, blowing air at the right time, knowing which tiny muscles to relax and which to tense.  

Childhood apraxia of speech is a motor planning disorder, as the child is thought to lack the ability to control and direct the various outputs for speech.  I wonder, though, if it’s a not a disorder in the traffic signal but rather the consciousness of signalling at all.  It is the difference between voluntary and involuntary, a flipped switch in some brains that says “this is something I must think about to execute.”  For apraxic brains, planning the making of words is something that must be learned and controlled. 

It is so strange to consider that perfectionism and hyperconsciousness are innate to certain brains.  I would never have believed such a thing possible had I not made the acquaintance of an apraxic child, and watched her spend three full years in near-wordlessness.  It is exceedingly bizarre to spy on a baby, but still more bizarre to find the baby secretly practicing words—alone, in a whisper, for weeks—before unveiling them for the public. The public, in this case, including anyone outside the baby’s own head. 

What else are you plotting?
One of the books I’ve read that has been most influential to me is Getting Things Done, because of the idea, new to me when I read it, that the brain remembers undone activities as open loops, and only by closing those loops (by transferring them to external capture), can we be calm, with minds like water.  It doesn't seem to work with the housework.  


Martha Stewart teaches us there is no limit on how well one may keep house.**  Housework expands infinitely to consume the time available.  Knowing when is the right time to stop requires you to know why you’re doing it, and “why?” is the question that always captures the brain.  Chores are the tasks necessary to stay alive and well, but they are ancillary to the purpose of our lives.  By definition, then, the only way to close the loop is to die.  The universe is infinite, but my time here is not.  

The housework life cycle starts with a burst, an all-consuming cleaning project so extreme as to require every ounce of energy and concentration until the job is complete—windows sparkling, furniture polished, floors pristine.  But within days of the crisis passing, new ones arise.  Sparing thought for ancillary tasks seems wasteful—sinful—when there are things to know, words to write, and people to love.  

So things, as they do, fall apart.




-----

*I’ve yet to re-read Moby Dick, but I’ve no defense for that.
**She also teaches us to never, ever to talk to the police.    

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Marc Randazza: Lawyer Role Model

Law students always think that legal ethics is going to be easy once they get out into practice.  Represent your client, tell the truth, do the right thing. Sounds simple enough, right?  In practice, they quickly realize that legal ethics and advocacy may or may not be simple, but they aren't easy. 

As a former law firm associate, I've had occasion to advocate in court for positions I didn't believe in, based on my client's instructions or those from the supervising partner.  It's tough to go and face judges, colleagues, and opposing counsel and argue something you don't believe.  Building a reputation is difficult, and it takes time, and you don't want to jeopardize it by making your colleagues think you aren't smart enough to understand that your position is weak.

So there's always a hint of temptation to give some subtle indication of: "well, I don't really believe this is what the law says, but here's why I want you to find that this is what the law says."  Who would want to jeopardize their relationships or reputation for a client whose case will be over soon? Who would put himself wholly on the line for his clients? 

I know of at least of one lawyer who would: Marc Randazza

While I don't know him personally, I've been following his work and his reputation enough years that I can say that Marc Randazza is one of the good ones, a lawyer who actually puts himself on the line on behalf of his clients without reservation.  All lawyers should strive to meet the standard he sets.

Popehat lists a few of Randazza's greatest hits here.  It strikes me that even the funny ones--like the Patent and Trademark brief about the history of dicks--are examples where Randazza puts himself on the line for the client.  I defy you to read the whole brief and tell me that Randazza shows any hint of shame or apology for his clients.  That's in addition to the excellent legal skill and savvy he demonstrates in the brief. 

I hope that if I'm ever tested as a lawyer to the extent that he has been--I would be able to live up to the high standard that Marc Randazza sets. 

-----
Here are some major media stories by or about Marc Randazza.
Here are some other bloggers who also think highly of Mark Randazza:

The Time I Unleashed Marc Randazza On The ABA
Marc Randazza, Hero
Marc Randazza Would Support Me, Right?
Righthaven, Liquified
Marc Randazza: The Mark of Excellence
Marc Randazza: 1st Amendment Lawyer Exemplar
Marc Randazza: Super Lawyer, Super Blogger?
Marc Randazza, First Amendment Lawyer, on the Rush Limbaugh Fiasco
Marc Randazza: A Sentinel For Free Speech
Marc Randazza — First Amendment Badass
Marc Randazza: Why I Went To Law School
Marc Randazza
Marc Randazza, The First Amendment's Finest Friend
Rick Santorum v. Marc Randazza: A Dichotomy of Zealotry
Praised Be Marc Randazza
Marc Randazza – lawyer, blogger, free speech advocate
Marc Randazza, Among Other Sources of Inspiration
Marc Randazza, and some thoughts about the First Amendment